Author of Paranormal Romance
Header image

Ignore the um, lack of Nano updates at the moment! I'm still doing it, just regrouping for a new attack plan.

BUT! I have cover art to share! Pretty, pretty cover art. Wanna see?

So sweaty under that jacket. So yummy.

So sweaty under that jacket. So yummy.

For those of you playing along at home, the first book features Noah, my fallen angel. This book features Zane, my dark n' sexy vampire. Love it. I can't decide which one I like more!

And if you're wanting to pick up book two, the release date has been moved up a week. Woot! So look for it on January 19th instead of January 26th. Exciting, isn't it?

So, plotting. Some people ‘pants’ their way through a novel, without an outline except what’s running through their heads. Some people religiously outline before starting a book. There’s really no wrong way to write a novel, but I know that a lot of people will tell you that if you are a pantser, you’d better learn how to plot once you get contracted! Or else! And I think I’ve even said that before myself.

But here’s the thing. It’s not like if you’re a pantser, you turn in this random mess of garbage to your editor. You don’t claim that 25 independent chapters are a book, and weird shit happens on page 3 and then we switch narrators on page 300. Or maybe we do. Anyhow. I’m a pantser. I shamelessly admit this. I don’t like to know where a novel is going until we’ve shaken hands and possibly gone out on a first date. This is about page 50 or so.

This post gets really, really long right about here (fair warning).

I digress – I did want to share plotting out book 2 for my succubus series. When we had editor interest, my agent said “Can you come up with a concept for book 2?” So I sent her back a paragraph blurb about what I thought book 2 would be about. My agent wanted more info, so I actually came up with an extended ‘back blurb’ pitch. I phrased it like the back of a book, got into a little more detail about who would be doing what, and included some plot points that were key and a few funny scenes I was interested in writing. The whole thing was about a page. Not an outline by any stretch of the imagination.

Still, it was all I had when we sold the two book deal and got the go ahead to write it. I wrote the entire novel in about a month and a half, did an edit pass, and returned it to my editor. Because my book got rescheduled, it took a while for me to get edits because I got bumped.

But! The day of glorious edits came, and my editor had only small tweaks. Things like, “You’re not showing us why this character is likeable” or “I like this plot! Can we see more of it?” and just general clean-up. So I read through the book again (and it had been a while since I’d even thought about this book) to see what I thought of it as a reader.

And wow. What a surprise. I’d dropped entire story threads and characters back and forth in the book, and so when they popped up again on the back end, *I* was surprised. I’m the author!

This is not good.

About this time, Caitlin Kittredge posted her plot board for The Witch’s Alphabet . This looked inspiring to me, and organized! So I created one of my own, which you can see here.

Wall of Notes - Before

Wall of Notes - Before

Let me explain what you’re looking at. I broke the book up into chapters. For each chapter, there’s a white notecard and my main character’s interal conflict and external conflict. Mind you, since I’m a pantser, I had no idea what these conflicts were until I finished the book. So they needed tweaking as well.

At any rate, the white notecards are for the main character (Jackie). Since it’s 1st person POV, every chapter is in her POV so I don’t have to worry about her not being in the chapter. Each other color post-it is for someone else that interacts with her in the storyline, and each has their own motivation and subplot. One color post-it is actually for Jackie’s ‘growth’ arc. I wanted to make sure I built that across the story as well. This may look like a bunch of garbage, but if you pick apart the colors (like, say, pink), you’ll notice that there’s long spans of book where the character and their plotline doesn’t show up.

To me, this is bad. That means this character/plot isn’t even on the radar.

So I added notes to myself on how it should look when I’m done. I filled in notecards for the ‘missing’ plot holes and wrote such helpful things on the post-its like “ADD STUFF HERE STUPID”. Here’s the end board:

Plot Board - After!

Wall of Notes - After!

The colors are much more even, aren’t they?

Too bad these boards didn’t help me. Well, not really.

I mean, I tried really, really hard to be organized. I took my changes from this plot board and wrote them all out on an outline. For Chapter 3, I needed to add more X! Sprinkle in Y! Set up the plot for Z! And I was going to go chapter by chapter. First the page edits (which I always do, cleaning up phrasing and tweaking reactions). And then my editor’s edits! And then my notecards! And then I could finally move on to the next chapter!

And this was freaking overwhelming, y’all, it really was. I was going back over the same chapter over and over and over again without looking at the entire story’s cohesiveness and it was driving me crazy. Took me a week to just do one chapter. Obviously this wasn’t working for me.

So I went back to my old method. I made a list of things I wanted to fix. Things like this:

1) Make X more sympathetic.
2) Give Y a subplot! What’s his/her motivation?
3) Foreshadow Z a lot more!

And I treated each one as a separate draft. For the first draft, I’d work on nothing but #1 on the list, and making X more sympathetic. That was my entire goal. This might take 5 minutes, or it might take 4 days and re-tweaking every page. But that was my goal. Once that was done, I flipped back to the beginning of the manuscript, and started with #2. Rinse and repeat until I hit all bulletpoints. There were about 15 on my list, of various sizes. So this meant I re-read my manuscript over and over again, but it was far easier for me to tackle one aspect of revisions at a time than 20 all at once.

And when that was done, I printed out the manuscript one more time and read to make sure that it flowed as seamlessly on paper as it did in my brain.

And I liked it. I’m very happy with it, and I felt confident about turning it in. It might have taken me a dozen drafts and far more reads than I preferred, but that was my method, and it worked for me. Everyone’s methods are going to be different. The trick is finding what works for you.

Here’s the thing. I could have saved myself a lot of time (a LOT) by outlining the book ahead of time. Right? It would help if I was organized and knew that by Chapter 4, L needed to show up and cause trouble. And to foreshadow something by Chapter 7. But I didn’t, because that’s not my method.

I guess what I’m trying to say here is that being a pantser does not make you WRONG on how you write your book. It does not make your book less ‘well thought out’ than a plotter’s book. It does not make your work shoddy. It makes you have to do your editing and plotting on the back end of the book, rather than the front. I can edit and build plot and give the character a redeeming arc, but I have to have the groundwork laid first.

Make sense?

(And you may be that rare unicorn that can pants out a book with zero edits in the end, but I am not a unicorn. More of a donkey.)

Hey everyone!

After a month (well, almost) of slogging, I'm done with my edits. Hooray! I wasn't sure how I'd handle my first 'real' big change letter, but it was a learning experience and a fun process, and I'm 110% happier with my book now than I was when I started. So yay for that! I've got a few last minute tweaks to make and it'll be winging back to my editor. And that means a mini vacation for yours truly.

But I should be back to blogging again, which is nice. Things are moving along in the book publishing world -- I should be receiving finalized back cover copy soon (which I will share) and a few more blurbs (which I will also share).

In the meantime, I am thrilled to be done. It's a great feeling of accomplishment. :)

On Tuesday, I hit a milestone in the publishing sprint/marathon/turtle-crawl. I got my first edit letter. This is book 2 for my series, but book 1 never had an official letter – it was mostly verbal “Can you change this” or “Let’s go back to this version” etc etc. Book 2 was going to be my first, honest to goodness edit letter.

I was terrified to think of what it might contain. There’s always the horror story lurking in the back of your mind:

Dear Jill,

Start Over. Really. This blows.

Love,
Your Awesome Editor

Luckily, this wasn’t the case! My edits were actually pretty light, and the letter clocks in at 7 pages. For those of you wondering what the edit letter contains, here’s a quick and dirty breakdown of what mine has:

Page 1: Editor tells me how much she liked my book and a broad overview of what I did right. Yay!

Page 2: A broad overview of what I need to fix in the story. For me, I short-changed two subplots and have questionable motivation for two characters. Still easy fixes.

Page 3-7: Page notes. For example: “Page 231, you say “200 years but it’s really 400” or “Page 76: Man, she’s kind of being a jerk right here, isn’t she?”

All really great stuff. I printed my manuscript and have started working on it already. I wasn’t sure what my reaction would be – I’ve heard stories of authors weeping, calling their agents ranting about cruel editors, and all over the spectrum. Here’s basically how I reacted:

Page 1: This doesn’t sound bad…

Page 2: Ohmigod – that’s EXACTLY WHAT MY BETAS said. Wow. She caught that!

Page 3 – 7: Er…wow…there are a lot of notes here. ;)

In all seriousness, I love my notes. My editor knows exactly what I’m trying to do with the book, and there wasn’t really one single thing I disagreed with. She pinpointed my weak-spots with laser accuracy. And sprinkled into the letter are comments about parts that she found funny (which I loved) and parts which were…not (which made me realize I am not as funny as I think I am, hee).

I have difficulty with constructive criticism at the day job, so I was worried I’d be really upset at her notes. As in, must lay in bed and stew for 24 hours before I can possibly read these notes ever again (cue back of hand against forehead). But after reading her notes, I am totally pumped. 100% excited and ready to fix this bad boy.

Here’s the thing, though. You think critiques are hard? Those tough beta-readers? Those agents that gave you feedback that made you curl up into a fetal position? Those editors that passed on your submission because they didn’t like it?

Suck it up, because it doesn’t change now that you have a contract. Your editor is going to ask you to change a lot and she’s only going to sugar-coat it on page one. ;) Your book is now a Product (Yes, I said the “P” word), and she’s going to expect you to act like a professional.

My letter is absolutely great, but my editor doesn’t pull punches. She gives it to me like an adult. If my character acts like an asshole in chapter 20, she tells me. If I write an idiotic phrase, she points it out. And not with “Oh dear, special snowflake! You might have made a mistake! But it’s okay!! I love you!” Nope. Your editor is not there to lovingly stroke your hair and tell you that you are the bestest writer evaaaaaaaarrrr. She is there to make your book successful. And she already thinks you’re awesome because she bought your book. And if she thinks you wrote a moronic subplot in on page 157, she’s going to tell you to take it out, no matter how much you might love it.

If you want petting and love and sympathy, talk to your agent (well, maybe) or your parents (definitely).

But you’d still better fix that shit in your book, or the copyeditor is going to tear you a new one. ;)

(And I got agent notes on a different project yesterday. She didn’t stroke my hair either, come to think of it! But she pegged everything I thought was questionable. Love that. Best Agent Ever.)